You must be logged in to post
Search Forums:


 






Minimum search word length is 3 characters – Maximum search word length is 84 characters
Wildcard Usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

Mass voting on wearing life jackets at all times

UserPost

6:12 am
April 5, 2011


mossboss

Southwick,Ma

Member

posts 141

got this from BoatUS :
Dear Massachusetts BoatU.S. Member,

The Massachusetts State Legislature is considering a bill today that will require everyone, including adults, to wear lifejackets on boats under 20’ while in operation.

Currently in Massachusetts, life jackets must be onboard all boats, and worn by kids under 12, and worn by all who are waterskiing, on personal watercraft, or in canoe/kayaks in the winter. Our understanding of this legislation, House Bill 646, is that it will require everyone on boats less than 20’ to wear life jackets year-round.

I personally don't agree with this if it means having to wear it while I am fishingYell I don't mind wearing it while the big motor is running.

  This state is getting more screwed up everydayYell

5:23 pm
April 10, 2011


bmrev01

Moderator

posts 920

Mandatory life jacket bill sunk by lack of support

By Taylor Caroline Bigler
Patriot Ledger State House Bureau
Posted Apr 06, 2011 @ 05:29 AM
Last update Apr 06, 2011 @ 07:37 AM
.fb_ltr{padding-top:10px;}BOSTON —
A bill requiring boaters to wear life jackets seems to have gone overboard. The legislation filed by Rep. Vinny deMacedo, R-Plymouth, would require everyone, including adults, on board a boat under 20 feet to wear a life jacket while the boat is in operation.
At a State House hearing Tuesday, the Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security heard from legislators against deMacedo’s proposal.
Some were brief.
“Enough is enough. Adults can make decisions for themselves,” state Rep. Anne Gobi, D-Spencer, said in her short testimony. “I think it’s a ridiculous bill. Thank you.”
State law only requires that enough life jackets for everyone be on board. Only children younger than 12 are required to wear them.
State Rep. Steven Levy, R-Marlboro, echoed Gobi’s opinion. “This is an overreaching bill,” he said.
Committee Chairman Walter Timilty, D-Milton, called for anyone in favor of the bill to weigh in, but no one did.

__________________

About the Get Your Line Wet Forum

Forum Timezone: Etc/GMT+7

Most Users Ever Online: 76

Currently Online:
11 Guests

Currently Browsing this Topic:
1 Guest

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3
Forums: 57
Topics: 752
Posts: 1743

Membership:

There are 4289 Members

There is 1 Admin
There are 4 Moderators

Top Posters:

mossboss – 141
dave m – 68
deer357 – 47
XTeam0800 – 41
201tim – 21
jpavel – 20

Recent New Members: jcsparks3, bob c, ScooterBivins, joy89, nohula, livetohunt123

Administrators: FishFinder (162 Posts)

Moderators: bmrev01 (920 Posts), Henry Fristik (75 Posts), Sean Lloyd (32 Posts), Tom (0 Posts)